- Joined
- May 9, 2024
- Messages
- 299
- Reaction score
- 349
- Location
- Oceanside, San Diego
- Cars
- S560, Panamera, Palisade
I'm wondering why we haven't seen any videos from the more established reviewers. Taking their time?
It's an adapter between the standard 2" receiver and a proprietary connector, I call that a dongle.Ah, I usually understand dongle as a connector between “thing” and “thing it’s connecting to,” not simply “thing.”
It will be the first thing to hit when backing up a steep slope. Tow hitches mounted like this are very good at digging into the ground and possibly damaging the vehicle.What do you mean by it screwing up the departure angle? Not arguing; just not sure what you mean.
Do you know which one? I wonder if they were talking about internal capacity?One of today's reviews mentioned that the Gravity is huge, similar in dimension to a Chevy Suburban. In fact, Gravity is two feet shorter than a Suburban.
I’m not trying to argue; I don’t often use tow hitches, hence the confusion.It's an adapter between the standard 2" receiver and a proprietary connector, I call that a dongle.
Ah, gotcha. That’s probably why they say to remove it when not in use.It will be the first thing to hit when backing up a steep slope. Tow hitches mounted like this are very good at digging into the ground and possibly damaging the vehicle.
The two 12v thing was a thing on the Air too, fwiw.Anyway, I'll guess I'll have to look at the design to see if they could have just put it behind the bumper. Maybe it would intrude into the rear storage area but in that case I would have preferred a dongle that went straight back instead of down.
Obviously not a deal breaker, just annoyed by it. Most of the time I'd probably just put mountain bike inside since I think it should fit without removing and wheels. Also annoyed by the two 12V battery thing, sounds like German engineering.
Some Lucid guy says it measures the last 10 milesOne thing worried me a bit. In two of the videos (I should have been taking notes as to which and when) the drivers noted the car was getting about 2.2 miles/kWh. They weren't clear if that was the momentary usage or the usage measured over a certain prior period. However, in one of the shots showing the usage, you could see the speedometer showing 68 mph.
I wonder when Tom Moloughney will do his 70-mph range test and when the 75-mph test comes out from Car & Driver (or is it Edmunds?).
Some Lucid guy says it measures the last 10 miles
The car was recorded flying around in the dirt, going around twisty mountain roads and every reviewer would have been flooring it to test out the performance. It's not getting EPA under those circumstances.One thing worried me a bit. In two of the videos (I should have been taking notes as to which and when) the drivers noted the car was getting about 2.2 miles/kWh. They weren't clear if that was the momentary usage or the usage measured over a certain prior period. However, in one of the shots showing the usage, you could see the speedometer showing 68 mph.
I wonder when Tom Moloughney will do his 70-mph range test and when the 75-mph test comes out from Car & Driver (or is it Edmunds?).
Very surprised at the glowing review and the coherence of the article itself as Jalopnic usually is full of anti EV bias and low quality reporting. I have learned to steer clear but I actually read and enjoyed that review.“I've never driven a perfect car that can quite literally do it all, and I likely never will. However, the Gravity Grand Touring is just about as close as you can get.”
Read More: https://www.jalopnik.com/1833486/2025-lucid-gravity-suv-first-drive/
One more YouTube review has been posted. Moderators: please feel free to combine all links in my previous comment
I see that the 12V batteries are tiny so at least it's not adding weight.The two 12v thing was a thing on the Air too, fwiw.
I heard this from a few other folks, which is what makes it extra insane how positive all the reviews are. I mean, I knew I loved the vehicle, as does @TribbleTrouble, but it isn’t perfect. The reviews mention those imperfections, but also agree with me that they are minor in the grander scheme of things.And he said there were no limits put on what he could publish and that he was free to be as negative as he wanted to be.
Jalopnik is half-bantering, half-reporting. Like the old TG / Grand Tour. I love them.Very surprised at the glowing review and the coherence of the article itself as Jalopnic usually is full of anti EV bias and low quality reporting. I have learned to steer clear but I actually read and enjoyed that review.
Two cons I've seen repeated are how low it is (compared to standing upright and climbing inside an SUV that's typical) and the A pillar being huge and blocking some visibility in tight corners or in the city.I heard this from a few other folks, which is what makes it extra insane how positive all the reviews are. I mean, I knew I loved the vehicle, as does @TribbleTrouble, but it isn’t perfect. The reviews mention those imperfections, but also agree with me that they are minor in the grander scheme of things.
People are going to love this car.