And then there's the fact that, with Tesla sales in a tailspin in much of the world, the profitability of the Supercharger operation is becoming more critical to Tesla.
This. Tesla would not cannibalize what is effectively their only profit center.
Well, again, I was literally there, and the engineer who travels with the Gravity to all of the sites handed me the adapter. It was Leviton. I was simply stating a concern, and I quite "what gave me pause". They originally were planning on adding both ports. It proved to be impossible. I get it. The fact that there was a big Tesla protest around the corner from that Lucid gallery was also offputting!
Those are temporary adapters; rely on the press release and public announcements, as those are subject to material information laws. Lying in a public release would be a very, very bad idea. A salesperson saying something incorrect happens 44 times a minute, by my rough estimate. Those are not the adapters that will ship with the upcoming deliveries.
I experienced >300 charging on EA on my road trip in July. CCS isn't just EA-based, BTW. NACS is solely owned and operated by Tesla. All eggs in one basket, you know?
NACS is not solely owned and operated by Tesla. There are plenty of NACS cables across EVGo and EA, and others. They are adding more. NACS SAE J3400 is then standard, and it is “owned” by SAE, not Tesla.
From the press release: “To enable this experience for our customers, we developed new, unique technology to allow the 926V Lucid Gravity to charge seamlessly at up to 400 kW on 1000V charging equipment and at sustained speeds of up to 225 kW on 500V architecture fast chargers, including Tesla V3 Superchargers.” That’s a quote from SVP of Powertrain, Emad Dlala, the guy who literally runs the team that designed and built the system.
So you’re welcome to speculate and come up with reasons he’s lying, but I am certain you are wrong.
@HC_79’s tone may have been acerbic, but he wasn’t wrong. This speculation is FUD; it spreads fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD), but without any evidence whatsoever for the anxiety. That’s not actually helpful to anyone, except to those who want to stir up non-existent drama.
I recognize that you may not have read the forums before, to @WeighingGravity’s point, so I don’t think the tone was necessarily warranted, but we’ve had a larger and larger number of folks recently who show up and say the same thing, and it does get a bit grating.
I hope it doesn’t put you off; I’m sure that wasn’t the intent. It’s very easy for text to come off without the nuance it may have been originally written with.
Hopefully we can all move forward and have a nice thread henceforth.
