I have to disagree on this one.
Processes don't just exist in a vacuum. If the processes are the problem (and I 100% agree that they are a significant problem), somebody (or a committee of somebodys) is responsible for putting the processes in place, and somebody, et al., are responsible for not recognizing the issues or failing to fix the problematic processes.
Now I'm not saying that person or persons need to be immediately fired or anything.
Based on my experience in IT, you don't immediately fire the guy/gal who
accidentally caused an expensive production outage. Why would you fire them right after they just got such an expensive training/learning experience. Now they (and the rest of the team) know better and probably won't do it again.
You only fall back on during them if they fail to learn from their mistakes or show a willful disregard for doing things properly.
I have no insight into the inner workings at Lucid to know which is which, but hopefully the new CEO takes the time to properly determine the people who are worth keeping and those who are worth replacing.
Rushing into a decision on either direction doesn't seem wise to me.
Then again I'm just an aging IT guy who has avoided management duties like that plague, so what do I know?