As an owner of a Dec 2025 build Gravity, who doesn't often switch between second row seats up and down, what should I be looking for to identify if my car has this issue?
I believe it impacted 97% of vehicles produced, so safe to assume your vehicle is impacted / needs a fix.
I'm only really watching Lucid, so I can't talk about the whole industry. But Lucid's stock makes perfect sense, no need to speculate about rigging or other conspiracies. Lucid as a company continues to hemorrhage money, and their success depends on entering the mid-market and substantially expanding the volume of vehicles they sell. They continue to plod forwards in their preparation to launch Cosmos, but no real details of that have yet emerged, and the market doesn't like to bet on uncertainty. The stock price hasn't collapsed entirely because there's a lot that we know about Cosmos that might cause one to think a well executed launch could really turn the page for Lucid. But on the flip side, the Gravity's launch calls into serious question whether Lucid is capable of a well executed vehicle launch. And not just on the software side. Hardware quality and supply chain management have caused pretty big issues for the company. So the stock continues to be in a wait-and-see mode.
A friend of mine is bitter that his childhood dream of being employed as an asteroid miner is nowhere in sight.
What are the symptoms?
I don't know for sure, but it sounds like there may be none. Isn't it a change to the welding that results in the seat not being strong enough in an accident? I could be confused.
The symptoms are if your car was produced before February this year it’s recalled.
The claim (I believe) is that these two models are going to be built with 90+ % similar components.
I think their main target is bring Lucid down to $5.
Rawlinson is on record that an investor forced them to make a sedan as their first vehicle. Maybe the Saudis like sleek vehicles? Without having seen the Cosmos, I have no idea what I think about the design.
Aerodynamics, boxy SUVS don’t give you the range
Given Lucid's history, an anemic service network, SW bugs, vendor quality control, etc., I have a hard time seeing a good outcome. The mid-size $50k segment will be much less forgiving than the $100k/$150k segments. A lot of times, it is the owner's family's only car. Persistent problems and lack of service will quickly disqualify an entry.I think their main target is bring Lucid down to $5.
Its already April and they didnt show Cosmos yet to public and the car is ready for Production end of this year
Lucid's entire thesis is driving dynamics and efficiency. A sleeker midsize is a good introduction when they enter the midsize market
There is a good reason why they started with the more expensive models- figure out bugs in software, production and service. So they iron these out by the midsize. This is all expected and not a surprise.
I'm pretty comfortable Lucid will execute a package that won't be boxy, yet will allow for great interior packaging - they've done it before!
“Hasn’t collapsed entirely” … Lol it was over $50 with the 1/10 reverse it’s trading at about $.85
I don't think they intended to piss of any customers - but they have to cut their teeth on a first product. You can't skip that and go right to your second product.
