- Joined
- Aug 23, 2020
- Messages
- 3,603
- Reaction score
- 4,138
- Location
- Paradise Valley, AZ
- Cars
- Lucid GT
- Referral Code
- K9WIJHB0
Has anyone played much with improved range calculation. I like that it displays battery at way points and destination in %SOC rather than miles. It appears to be more accurate than before which was a dumb estimate based on EPA efficiency. However, I think it still overestimates the cars actual range
I have used ABRP multiple times for 200-400 mile trips and have tuned it to be very accurate for the way I drive. In the ABRP set up, I use 1% battery degradation, 3.68 mi/kWhr at 65 mph (I have 21" wheels), 115% of speed limit up to 80 mph. These settings usually give a result within 1% SOC from actual for my entire trip. I did a comparison between Lucid Navigation and ABRP for a round trip from my house to Prescott and back to my house. Here are the results:
I am not sure when I will take this drive but I am guessing that Lucid Navigation is still optimistic by about 10%.
I have used ABRP multiple times for 200-400 mile trips and have tuned it to be very accurate for the way I drive. In the ABRP set up, I use 1% battery degradation, 3.68 mi/kWhr at 65 mph (I have 21" wheels), 115% of speed limit up to 80 mph. These settings usually give a result within 1% SOC from actual for my entire trip. I did a comparison between Lucid Navigation and ABRP for a round trip from my house to Prescott and back to my house. Here are the results:
Lucid Navigation %SOC | ABRP %SOC | |
Home - start | 80% | 80% |
Prescott | 40% | 43% |
Home - end | 14% | 21% |
I am not sure when I will take this drive but I am guessing that Lucid Navigation is still optimistic by about 10%.