Reading through the 3.3.9 update thread, and there are a lot of posts from people reporting some issues after the update, as is usually the case. I'm also texting with a local guy who is about to take delivery of his own GGT as a first-time Lucid buyer, and he's a little concerned. I've been a member of this forum for over 3 years, since we took delivery of our '22 AGT. Yes, the original software was buggy, and yes, many people had some serious problems with their cars. In our case, I figured that we had just gotten lucky, and aside from some random issues that arose from time to time, the car was incredible, and just got better and better over time. I took delivery of my GGT exactly a month ago. I should have had 3.3.2 installed, but didn't, so I've been through all the updates since then. Yes, after the upgrade to 3.3.5 I had to do a fob battery reset to get the car to recognize it, but otherwise, things have been nearly flawless. The occasional false alerts popped up here and their, but since the firmware update, and the latest upgrade to 3.3.9, I can't remember the last time I saw one. (I did get a 'key not found' message at one point, but that was legit- a buddy was trying out the launch mode, and apparently it was enough to launch the key out of my pocket to land under the 2nd row).
I guess my point to all of this is to suggest an alternative to the majority of the recent posts that highlight nothing but (mostly) software problems. The broad consensus seems to be that the car is well built, and engineering marvel, and an absolute dream to drive. But.. It also has a lot of software issues. I suspect that for a lot of owners- including myself- this doesn't apply.
In my case, the car has been fantastic. No real issues at all, and maybe that should be a message that we could also be highlighting on this board.
This is not to diminish or disregard the real problems faced by many of the posters here- clearly, their experiences are real, and troubling (@hmp10 - I'm looking at you. Don't know how you managed not to burn the whole place down). I guess I just don't know how representative they are of the overall universe of Gravity owners. I had similar thoughts when we got our Air. Sure, the software was lacking, but it didn't detract from the overall experience at all, and it got better pretty quickly. I didn't say much about it on the forum at the time, because I didn't want to jinx myself, thinking that I was in a lucky minority. Speaking to people since then, I've come to realize that my experience was actually pretty typical for the early adopters, and I suspect that it's the same for the Gravity.
At any rate, just a thought
I guess my point to all of this is to suggest an alternative to the majority of the recent posts that highlight nothing but (mostly) software problems. The broad consensus seems to be that the car is well built, and engineering marvel, and an absolute dream to drive. But.. It also has a lot of software issues. I suspect that for a lot of owners- including myself- this doesn't apply.
In my case, the car has been fantastic. No real issues at all, and maybe that should be a message that we could also be highlighting on this board.
This is not to diminish or disregard the real problems faced by many of the posters here- clearly, their experiences are real, and troubling (@hmp10 - I'm looking at you. Don't know how you managed not to burn the whole place down). I guess I just don't know how representative they are of the overall universe of Gravity owners. I had similar thoughts when we got our Air. Sure, the software was lacking, but it didn't detract from the overall experience at all, and it got better pretty quickly. I didn't say much about it on the forum at the time, because I didn't want to jinx myself, thinking that I was in a lucky minority. Speaking to people since then, I've come to realize that my experience was actually pretty typical for the early adopters, and I suspect that it's the same for the Gravity.
At any rate, just a thought