Lucid Gravity Touring - Now Available

It seems like the BMW iX3 is going to pose some stiff competition for Lucid. The Gravity has much better packaging and interior space, so for those wanting three actually-usable rows of seating, it's no contest. But iX3 seems to be expected to come in at about 400 miles EPA range, and (considering BMW's EV history) perhaps a real-world range closer to EPA range. And the iX3 seems to be priced quite a lot lower.
The iX3 is a compact SUV. It's 10 inches shorter in length than the Gravity and 4 inches narrower (based on my quick Internet search), with significantly less storage space. The iX is the more appropriate competition currently.
 
Touring appears to be almost exact as GT with exception of drivetrain with smaller battery (reducing range by 113 miles), reduced horsepower 560 vs 828 which results in lower towing capacity 3500 vs 6000 lbs. Reduced 670V elec. architecture vs 900V, resulting in slightly slower DC fast charging. Visually it is exactly as GT and includes exact same color choices and options. Basically smaller battery, slightly slower charging, less HP, keep everything else, cut price $15,000.
I don’t see massaging seats on the Touring. It’s the only feature that appears to be unavailable.
 
I don’t see massaging seats on the Touring. It’s the only feature that appears to be unavailable.
Massage seats are in the description of the touring when you select the luxury seating option, just like the GT.

I think the only difference is range, charging capacity and acceleration.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8807.webp
    IMG_8807.webp
    105.9 KB · Views: 176
This had been discussed before. The mileage deduct for 7 seat is probably not realistic. With GGT , adding the 3rd row pushed weight into different weight category on EPA calculation (I think they go in 500lb increments even though seats are much less). I guess with touring, the starting point on weight was low enough so that when adding 3rd row, it did not push Touring into next 500lb increment, so no mileage penalty. Leason learned, ignore the range differences between 2 row and 3 row. Wheel/tire will have a much bigger affect on range.
In the Car and Driver article they said it basically was able to get 300 mixed driving due to being more efficient in the City, and did 267 at 75mph. So hard to say exactly how the configuration will changes things. Either way it charges faster than all the competition.
 
It seems like the BMW iX3 is going to pose some stiff competition for Lucid. The Gravity has much better packaging and interior space, so for those wanting three actually-usable rows of seating, it's no contest. But iX3 seems to be expected to come in at about 400 miles EPA range, and (considering BMW's EV history) perhaps a real-world range closer to EPA range. And the iX3 seems to be priced quite a lot lower.
There is 0 chance an iX3 will be under 100K once out the door.
 
Seems to me the general sentiment here is “I want almost a GT”s range for less money.” And that flies in the face of the basic math of EVs.

If you want more range (or more hp) that’s what GT is for. It’s literally the only difference. You can configure Touring exactly the same as GT otherwise.

They will easily sell 3x as many Touring as they do GT. The money difference alone opens up a much wider audience.

A “fully loaded”Touring is $20k less than a fully loaded GT. Do you honestly think most people would choose a baseline GT over a fully loaded Touring, just to go a little faster in their 7-passenger family hauler?
I think the issue is less so wanting more power and more so of wanting more range. The touring with 20/21s is 100+ less miles than the GT. That is a huge difference. The going faster is nice, but the more range equals longer distance, less charging stops and even quicker charging times which makes all of the difference in an EV. My wife doesn't need the power, so I was going to sell her on the touring, but for the price delta, I'd rather us swing up to the GT for all the benefits of the added range since this will be our roadtrip vehicle. My feelings is "if your budget tops out at the Touring, then do it. If you can swing it, the GT makes more sense."

I'd say though this, if anything, shows how good the GT is and has become the baseline of comparison. Compared to a GT, the Touring is not seeming like such a good deal. Compared to anything else at this price point, the Touring is actually a strong offering. I do think it will sell more than the GT as you suggested, but I can also see people considering the Touring initially but going up to the GT for the additional range if their budget allows. I know it seems silly to think about value on an $100k+ car, but it matters as well and that is what I think Lucid is thinking about here too.
 
There is 0 chance an iX3 will be under 100K once out the door.
Hmm - are you in the US? As at least in the US, the iX3 will be starting around $60k. A quick google search will show plenty of articles saying that including BMW. Maybe you were joking though. 🙂
 
Hmm - are you in the US? As at least in the US, the iX3 will be starting around $60k. A quick google search will show plenty of articles saying that including BMW. Maybe you were joking though. 🙂
I doubt it once it's tariffed and all the BMW options are added. Just like Lucid advertised you can get a Gravity under 80K it's the base model Touring with no options, not the one with the max charging and range. Just like the base Cayenne is starts at $111K. You would need the M50 Ix3 to get even close to the Touring's performance. The current M50 is already 90K.
 
I doubt it once it's tariffed and all the BMW options are added. Just like Lucid advertised you can get a Gravity under 80K it's the base model Touring with no options, not the one with the max charging and range. Just like the base Cayenne is starts at $111K. You would need the M50 Ix3 to get even close to the Touring's performance. The current M50 is already 90K
I would bet it most definitely will. Who knows what influence any tarriffs will have then too. There is absolutely no way it will cost more than the current IX, which is a bigger car. Base Cayenne is a total rip off and will not sell well, just like the current Macan does not sell well in the US. Have not seen on Macan EV in my area yet, but also don’t seem many if hardly any Lucids. Don’t care about the M50, as just want an EV that gets max real range and provides good comfort/options. Hope BMW does start it at $60k as will put more pressure on price for other EV mfg’s. Also - I don’t consider it a competitor of the Gravity, the IX or X5 would be that. 🙂

EV’s have to start getting more closer in price than their ICE car counterparts, otherwise the EV movement will just continue to grow at a snails pace.. Already is growing at the pace in the US/Canada and will continue too, as long as they put them out of price range of most consumers.
 
None apparently, only loyalty as I was told by my SA
They’ll have a ton in December or by end of December when they realize they can’t sell the Touring or the GT. They’re not offering 1.99% on Touring yet, but they’ll have to. In addition to other incentives.
 
Even if the BMW is priced somewhat higher than the $60k announced price, I'm sure optioned up it will be under $100k. Plus BMW will offer low cost lease options to move them out. By the time Earth is introduced the iX3 will be firmly entrenched in that part of the market.
 
EV’s have to start getting more closer in price than their ICE car counterparts, otherwise the EV movement will just continue to grow at a snails pace
Never going to happen. Battery prices can’t come down enough and tax incentives closing some of the gap are gone for at least 3.5 years. Unless we suddenly let Chinese EVs come to the US and try to get real competition- but Chinese EVs have massive subsidies from their government, so not really level playing ground. EV movement already is slowing.

Having driven EV for 12+ years I’d never go back. But I can afford to pay the premium to do so. Most of the world can’t and won’t. Lucid, Tesla, Rivian - they’re all looking at smaller overall pie, I think. I don’t say that as an investor, but as someone who wishes the pie were growing and more folks could get in EVs.
 
Massage seats are in the description of the touring when you select the luxury seating option, just like the GT.

I think the only difference is range, charging capacity and acceleration.
Thanks for pointing that out. I couldn’t find it.

So it’s range and anything that can potentially bring more folks to the brand is great.

Unless they’re going to make a rear drive only variant, like Pure, which also has no glass roof and a manual frunk - they’re can’t get miles up.

Lucid has to move on and focus on mid market. They’re not going to muck around with more options for the Gravity Touring, IMO.
 
I think the issue is less so wanting more power and more so of wanting more range. The touring with 20/21s is 100+ less miles than the GT. That is a huge difference. The going faster is nice, but the more range equals longer distance, less charging stops and even quicker charging times which makes all of the difference in an EV. My wife doesn't need the power, so I was going to sell her on the touring, but for the price delta, I'd rather us swing up to the GT for all the benefits of the added range since this will be our roadtrip vehicle. My feelings is "if your budget tops out at the Touring, then do it. If you can swing it, the GT makes more sense."

I'd say though this, if anything, shows how good the GT is and has become the baseline of comparison. Compared to a GT, the Touring is not seeming like such a good deal. Compared to anything else at this price point, the Touring is actually a strong offering. I do think it will sell more than the GT as you suggested, but I can also see people considering the Touring initially but going up to the GT for the additional range if their budget allows. I know it seems silly to think about value on an $100k+ car, but it matters as well and that is what I think Lucid is thinking about here too.
For $80k it’s going to largely have the same driving dynamics and features. It’s a solid deal compared to an $80k Rivian (if that even exists) or a $100k X.

The biggest issue for broader market is not trim or price - it’s reliability and bugs. Anyone doing any Googling (or even a demo drive!) will be scared off by the reviews and issues folks have had.

For as much as I’d never buy an iX or Porsche EV, or Mercedes Q whatever - I’ve driven them, and friends have them, and have never, ever had an issue where they wouldn’t go into drive or some other whacky bug. That’s more for bug thread…

Love my Gravity, but I think it stays super niche unless and until bugs are gone.
 
Last edited:
Even if the BMW is priced somewhat higher than the $60k announced price, I'm sure optioned up it will be under $100k. Plus BMW will offer low cost lease options to move them out. By the time Earth is introduced the iX3 will be firmly entrenched in that part of the market.
So will the R2.
 
Even if the BMW is priced somewhat higher than the $60k announced price, I'm sure optioned up it will be under $100k. Plus BMW will offer low cost lease options to move them out. By the time Earth is introduced the iX3 will be firmly entrenched in that part of the market.
This I would agree with, and it's much more of a Mid-size competitor. I think it will be a great option, the I4 is already doing well in the US. I absolutely think there is room for EV trims that are max range/lux/comfort packs rather than the big wheel power cars.
 
This I would agree with, and it's much more of a Mid-size competitor. I think it will be a great option, the I4 is already doing well in the US. I absolutely think there is room for EV trims that are max range/lux/comfort packs rather than the big wheel power cars.
My sense is Earth will be a year late to the party and will find it really tough to compete with R2 and offerings from BMW, Mercedes, Audi. Time will tell.
 
For $80k it’s going to largely have the same driving dynamics and features. It’s a solid deal compared to an $80k Rivian (if that even exists) or a $100k X.

The biggest issue for broader market is not trim or price - it’s reliability and bugs. Anyone doing any Googling (or even a demo drive!) will be scared off by the reviews and issues folks have had.

For as much as I’d never buy an iX or Porsche EV, or Mercedes Q whatever - I’ve driven them, and friends have them, and have never, ever had an issue where they wouldn’t go into drive or some other whacky bug. That’s more for bug thread…

Love my Gravity, but I think it stays super niche unless and until bugs are gone.
The R1S is probably its closest comparison, as the standard starts around $76k but the one with similar range starts at $84k, but granted, the 7 seats are included. I wouldn't say the Gravity is a better "deal" comparatively, but it offers a more well rounded package for most people with much faster charging speeds and luxury features that are downright missing in a Rivian. Several comparisons have been made between the two and it seems like they are very much defining this premium 3 row EV segment. All that to say, the Touring is competitive with its range and power for this segment, just seems a big stepdown from the GT (keyword "seems", its still a lot cheaper and on its own, its a legit offering). I have a feeling that it will sell well. As for the Model X, that vehicle is on another planet. I don't know who would drop $100k for one with less range, space and power (unless going plaid) than its competitors.

Agreed on the bugs issues. That is my biggest holdup currently. My Rivian works. PaaK works. The apps on it work. It acts as predicted. I'm excited to eventually get the Gravity to enjoy a better ride, massaging seats and faster charging times, but don't want to end up soured on a $100k+ purchase because the vehicle doesn't want to start. I'm sure Lucid is aware that bugs are haunting them right now and it seems like they are acting quick, so hopefully this is all a small blip on the Gravity rollout story. I mean, even at $80k, these bugs are a lot to stomach. They'd be a lot to stomach an any new car, truly.

I work a 3 minute drive from the Roswell, GA service center and pull in to the lot to stare at the Gravity whenever I get a chance. It is a beautiful vehicle. I do wonder how many other people are holding off until the software is more mature and things like Apple Carplay and PaaK are available. I do fully expect a success story once Lucid has the software situation more in control and can start churning more Gravity orders, specially if they are expecting more volume from the touring trim.
 
There seems to be room for a Touring with an upgraded large pack with 100-105KWhr in between the base Touring and GT kind of like what Rivian does. Although I found a GT that may have lots of discounts to below a loaded Touring that is also a good move.
 
Back
Top