Interested in Previewing Future Lucid Air Software?

I understand the strip-tease routine to generate excitement and anticipation. But I think this is not what Lucid needs at this point of the game.
Lucid needs to come across of showing us what UX3 on the Air is all about and EXACTLY what it delivers and WHEN!
Everything else is superfluous!
The CEO has acknowledged that prior products were rushed and released before they were ready. So it that vein it seems that a deliberate rollout is exactly what Lucid needs. This is a company that can ill-afford another botched software launch. It would completely undermine the new leadership team.
 
I thought Lucid said that CCC V1 Airs will get only maintenance updates to UX2 going forward. Airs built with CCC V2 or upgraded to CCC V2 will get UX3. This may also mean the possibility of future feature updates for those UX3 cars.
Correct. And I believe their rep clarified that point on this forum a few months ago.
 
Anyone else wish this was available on zoom or some other way to at least view it happening live?
I am certain lots of people wish this were true. That would also make it harder to manage and may result in less useful feedback than a small, focused group.

But I can definitely understand both sides.
 
Yes, I know that. I wanted to wait to see that UX3 for the Air is real before I spend another$1k on CCCV2-UX3.

My understanding is, CCCV2 does nothing for the Air in UX2.
That isn’t true. There are already features gated on CCCv2 in Air, like the Google Places integration. Infotainment is also faster, and regardless of UX3, there will undoubtedly be other features gated on CCCv2.

But you do not have to buy it and can wait if you feel like it.
 
I am certain lots of people wish this were true. That would also make it harder to manage and may result in less useful feedback than a small, focused group.

But I can definitely understand both sides.
Which is why I would have loved even just 'viewing' without ability to interact thus still allowing the smaller focus group yet others to listen in!
 
That isn’t true. There are already features gated on CCCv2 in Air, like the Google Places integration. Infotainment is also faster, and regardless of UX3, there will undoubtedly be other features gated on CCCv2.

But you do not have to buy it and can wait if you feel like it.
Isn't "Google Places" embedded in Android Auto already?

Regardless, I thinkUX3 fir the Air isa good thing. I haven't upgraded to CCS2 yet. I will believe it when I see it.

I understand Lucid/@maqie want informed Air users to participate and keep the meeting small and interactive. What puzzles me is why they posted an open invitation on this forum with less than 10 days to the actual event.

UX3 on Air has been promised for a while. We still have no release date yet!
 
time is up, enrollment closed. form is 'no longer active' as of 3:40p.m.
good luck!
 
...What puzzles me is why they posted an open invitation on this forum with less than 10 days to the actual event....
I imagine the short timeline is because Lucid is trying to release new functionality to the Air as quickly as they can.
 
Isn't "Google Places" embedded in Android Auto already?
I’m referring to their integration with native Lucid nav.
Regardless, I thinkUX3 for the Air isa good thing. I haven't upgraded to CCS2 yet. I will believe it when I see it.
Cool :)

I understand Lucid/@maqie want informed Air users to participate and keep the meeting small and interactive. What puzzles me is why they posted an open invitation on this forum with less than 10 days to the actual event.
Dno, but I’d rather they post it than not.

UX3 on Air has been promised for a while. We still have no release date yet!
true
 
I’m referring to their integration with native Lucid nav.

Cool :)


Dno, but I’d rather they post it than not.


true
I hope Lucid learned it lessons and make sure UX3 on the Air is thoroughly validated through all use-conditions and not just focus on the eye-candies and features. SW/HW validation is non-glamorous, but essential!
 
I hope Lucid learned it lessons and make sure UX3 on the Air is thoroughly validated through all use-conditions and not just focus on the eye-candies and features. SW/HW validation is non-glamorous, but essential!
Lucid is supposed to be on record to release UX 3 for the air by end Q3 2026. That is only 2 weeks from now.



Obviously, we want Lucid to release a version that is thoroughly tested and validated.

Is this Sep 15 events a signal that's UX3 Air is ready for PrimeTime ?
 
Lucid is supposed to be on record to release UX 3 for the air by end Q3 2026. That is only 2 weeks from now.



Obviously, we want Lucid to release a version that is thoroughly tested and validated.

Is this Sep 15 events a signal that's UX3 Air is ready for PrimeTime ?
I believe the target, as referenced in the article was "fall." But that suggestion was provided in January. Given the change in leadership and more recent comments I would expect that UX 3.0 will be released when it's ready. The current leadership team is placing more emphasis on getting things right than doing things quickly. Holding to an arbitrary date if the software is not fully baked would not be in their best interest.
 
I believe the target, as referenced in the article was "fall." But that suggestion was provided in January. Given the change in leadership and more recent comments I would expect that UX 3.0 will be released when it's ready. The current leadership team is placing more emphasis on getting things right than doing things quickly. Holding to an arbitrary date if the software is not fully baked would not be in their best interest.
Clearly, UX 3 should be release only when it is ready.

My take is, if Lucid is just getting owner's inputs tomorrow, it is unlikely it is ready for prime time.
 
Clearly, UX 3 should be release only when it is ready.

My take is, if Lucid is just getting owner's inputs tomorrow, it is unlikely it is ready for prime time.
Oh is this the first customer input ever for ux3? I wasn’t aware of that.
And if the system design is similar to what I think it could be, they could easily change what shows where without having to do any rewrite.
I mean we’ve been building sw that configures itself at runtime like for decades. If you want it dynamic then a simple wrapper to capture triggers to change that can reread the layout. I’ve designed systems that are a shirtload of tiny modules,like legos, that can be assembled and reassembled easily but not changing a LINE of code.
Maybe things like how do you like what we did to bring back the old seatbelt warning that also meets regulations
 
Last edited:
Oh is this the first customer input ever for ux3? I wasn’t aware of that.
And if the system design is similar to what I think it could be, they could easily change what shows where without having to do any rewrite.
I mean we’ve been building sw that configures itself at runtime like for decades. If you want it dynamic then a simple wrapper to capture triggers to change that can reread the layout. I’ve designed systems that are a shirtload of tiny modules,like legos, that can be assembled and reassembled easily but not changing a kind of code.
Maybe things like how do you like what we did to bring back the old seatbelt warning that also meets regulations
I think they’re hiring!
 
I’m as excited for ux 3.0 as anyone else but it bears to note the distinct lack of “Air Issues” posts over the last several months (albeit after the serious bricking incident). But since then and the subsequent rollout of the fix, it seems a lot quieter on the Air front in terms fo software complaints. So I guess we should be careful what we wish for and enjoy the relative stability we have now.

For me, they can take all the time they need to get 3.0 right.
 
Oh man… just saw that I didn’t make the cut for the Air software preview event ☹️😪
 
Back
Top