Recent content by JoshG

maybe. But they'd have had no possible damage or legal issue by simply posting "we are aware of the issue and ask for some patience while we decide on a path" or something. They do have a great representative here on the forum who has relayed similar things from their management team in the...

very good and helpful perspective. Appreciate you voicing that here.

While I don't completely agree, you make a reasonable case on how I should view this. My own charges are now "waived." Good for me, sure. But as someone who cares about the company and brand and as a financial stakeholder in the company, I really want them to fix this for all of our benefit.

I hope some financial analyst who follows the company will ask about this issue on their next earnings call, making the execs finally address it publicly. They clearly aren't going to do so otherwise. I'm still a shareholder in the company... I don't wish them harm! In fact, I think them...

Posted an update to my own case over on the other active thread in a different forum area, linked here. I'm afraid it's not going to provide any encouragement to others with a lease, considering a lease, or for anyone (regardless of financing choice) who worry about the brand damage Lucid is...

Well, I have an update and official reply from Lucid, and unfortunately, it doesn’t suggest the company is making any meaningful effort to review or revise its policies, or the actions of its financial partners. I wrote a summary of my lease-end dispute, explaining how Lucid or its partners are...

thank you. I didn't infer any bad intent... if it helps, as long as there are two forum areas for this discussion, my temptation is to crosspost updates to both of those threads which seems silly. If they're both in "general", seems we can let there be one thread for this ongoing discussion...

Can I ask @borski and @joec why this thread has been moved to the subforum area called "Ordering / Pricing / Production / Delivery"? While I guess some number of future potential lessees may come across it there, the audience it's most relevant to right now are those getting ready to return...

OK, more press interest in this story. Reporter seeking people here to interview. I was contacted by a financial reporter who is currently working on a story about Lucid's lease difficulties and the number of people who feel they've been mistreated by the company and/or their lending partner...

OK, more press interest in this story. Reporter seeking people here to interview. I was contacted by a financial reporter who is currently working on a story about Lucid's lease difficulties and the number of people who feel they've been mistreated by the company and/or their lending partner...

Heard back from @marqie that they'll definitely reply to me by Monday (7/27) on where they're at with my case of the egregious charge on my lease return. Then at the end of the same day, they emailed me to say it's going to be longer and now they're aiming for a response to me by Friday. 🤦‍♂️...

Add me to the list to try to retroactively fix the deducted points. Ordered one on rewards store last week. Thank you @marqie

Well, that one item in my list of items supporting the mods seems to have changed, or maybe i didn't notice where and when this discussion was moved previously. This is the more negative and active thread, and it has been moved to a subforum called "Ordering / Pricing / Production / Delivery"...

Not sure if I can shout "Good News"... but I just read my complete lease agreement, and, surprisingly, there is no binding arbitration requirement, no mediation clause, and no language compelling disputes to be handled outside court. So I'm free to pursue this with a claim with small claims...

So this means I must go through this process before filing for small claims court action?