Target $0

Napoli said capital raise will be positive for shareholders, wonder what he meant by that…..
It will be positive for the shareholders long term with a short term hit on the stock. What's worse? That would be no viable options for capital raise and bankruptcy.
 
PIF is gonna take the money they were going to spend on LIV Golf and just give it to Lucid as an early Christmas present. No dilution. No interest payments. Just a pile of cash in a box with gift wrapping.

Very positive.
 
PIF is gonna take the money they were going to spend on LIV Golf and just give it to Lucid as an early Christmas present. No dilution. No interest payments. Just a pile of cash in a box with gift wrapping.

Very positive.
I don't think the Saudis celebrate christmas bro
 
https://****************.com/lucid/lucid-draws-another-400m-from-pif-as-market-cap-drops-below-1-5b/

TIL that PIF's preferred stock holdings gets a 9% annual dividend of additional shares.
 
Mid 3's now. 😞
The outflow continues; they withdrew another $400 million. The company is still losing substantial funds. A GT with seven seats costs just over $4,000 more than a Model YL with promotions, yet buyers remain absent. Lucid must wake up, roll up its sleeves, fix the software, and deliver the advertised vehicle. It is highly likely this is not Lucid’s DNA—claiming software is irrelevant while calling the cars well-engineered—but buyers ask one question: will it unlock 100%? 🤔 Lucid will keep repeating that its cars are great, fast, and sleek, and so on.
 
It might be time for me to just take the capital loss and call it a day. This ain’t lookin too good. I’m just happy I only invested fun money several years ago.
 
It might be time for me to just take the capital loss and call it a day. This ain’t lookin too good. I’m just happy I only invested fun money several years ago.
This is not a loss; it is disastrous, falling from $10 to 35 cents and reaching $60 at its peak. It serves as a prime example of a company with a strong product and poor management.
 
...It is highly likely this is not Lucid’s DNA—claiming software is irrelevant while calling the cars well-engineered...
Who at Lucid claimed software is irrelevant?
 
This is not a loss; it is disastrous, falling from $10 to 35 cents and reaching $60 at its peak. It serves as a prime example of a company with a strong product and poor management.
It’s really the only reason I sold my Lucid, loss of faith in where the company was going. I remember well all the posts that said, ‘just wait for the SUV, things will turn around’. Well that ship has sailed. Now it’s ’just wait for the midsize, things will turn around’. It’s amazing how many people still haven’t heard of Lucid.

I hope they survive, but I’ve had strong doubts for some time now. :(
 
It’s really the only reason I sold my Lucid, loss of faith in where the company was going. I remember well all the posts that said, ‘just wait for the SUV, things will turn around’. Well that ship has sailed. Now it’s ’just wait for the midsize, things will turn around’. I hope they survive, but I’ve had strong doubts for some time now. :(
Yes, as of today they delivered 0 things on time promised and keep ignoring on many other they are supposed to deliver.
 
This is not a loss; it is disastrous, falling from $10 to 35 cents and reaching $60 at its peak. It serves as a prime example of a company with a strong product and poor management.
The $60 peak high was a joke, not reality of where the company was. EV stocks were meme stocks at the time. Realistically, if all went reasonably better, this would have been valued at 10 billion today. That’s 1/2 Rivian, mainly due to a lower capital raise at IPO. People saying it dropped from $600 to $3.5 are not realizing the fundamentals.
 
The $60 peak high was a joke, not reality of where the company was. EV stocks were meme stocks at the time. Realistically, if all went reasonably better, this would have been valued at 10 billion today. That’s 1/2 Rivian, mainly due to a lower capital raise at IPO. People saying it dropped from $600 to $3.5 are not realizing the fundamentals.
The fundamental objective for any car company is to sell profitable cars at volume. After 5 years on the market Lucid is no closer to achieving that goal than when they started. The market has recognized that and the stock is priced as such. And declining production of Air and Gravity with an uncertain launch of Cosmos does not bode well for the future.
 
The outflow continues; they withdrew another $400 million. The company is still losing substantial funds. A GT with seven seats costs just over $4,000 more than a Model YL with promotions, yet buyers remain absent. Lucid must wake up, roll up its sleeves, fix the software, and deliver the advertised vehicle. It is highly likely this is not Lucid’s DNA—claiming software is irrelevant while calling the cars well-engineered—but buyers ask one question: will it unlock 100%? 🤔 Lucid will keep repeating that its cars are great, fast, and sleek, and so on.
Yet there is influencer saying a 5 seats GT cost double model YL.
Yes I know its the options etc, but I bet Tesla is paying those influence directly or indirectly.
 
Yet there is influencer saying a 5 seats GT cost double model YL.
Yes I know its the options etc, but I bet Tesla is paying those influence directly or indirectly.
Marketing is a joke! Hardly anyone heard of the Lucid Air and it’s been out 5 years…..
 
Back
Top