I took my 2023 Lucid Air Pure AWD to a race track and here are my in depth comments

codys21

Active Member

Verified Owner
Joined
Aug 11, 2022
Messages
190
Reaction score
138
Cars
2023 Air Pure
Referral Code
85MVYCO8
First, this is going to be quite long so feel free to skim or jump to any section you're more interested in.

Second, I've also taken my car to autocross and that post is here.

Based on my research, it looks like only one other person has posted anything about taking an Air to a track, otherwise nobody else has posted anything about taking an Air to autocross or to a race track (other than the Sapphire for like Car and Driver Lightning Lap), so I want to post about my experience.

Intro: I went to I29 Speedway (formerly RPM (Raceway Park of the Midlands) formerly MAM (Mid America Motorplex)) in Pacific Junction, IA. It's 2.23 miles long and a pretty simple, very safe track that I've been to a couple times before in a 2015 BMW M4 convertible, so I knew this would be a decent place to take the Air. It also has a straight almost a half mile long.

As I've been here with my M4 before, I'll do a few comparisons between the two cars. Here's a quick summary of the two cars:
Car2023 Lucid Air Pure AWD2015 BMW M4 Convertible
HP480430
Curb Weight~5,000~4,000
Tire Size245/45R19265/35ZR-19 front, 285/35ZR-19 rear
Tire TypePirelli P Zero AS Plus Elect (500 treadwear)Michelin Pilot Sport 4S (Max Performance Summer) (300 treadwear)
Drive typeAWDRWD

It's easy to see from the chart above the Air: 1) weighs more, 2) has narrower tires, 3) has tires with considerably less grip
In addition, I put brake pads on my M4 that are specifically for track days. I made no modifications at all to the Air.

This track has some specific HPDE (high performance drivers education) events, but those are more structured in "sessions" where each driver has specific times they are allowed on the track, which may look something like this:
1751299076038.webp

Sometimes, there are only 2 or 3 groups, but either way, this generally limits a driver to about 20 minutes on the track and 40 minutes off. I knew this style wouldn't work well for having to leave and charge (charger 20 minutes away).

This specific event I ran was a "Super Sunday" which was only for experienced drivers and there were no sessions; the track was hot from 10a-noon and again from 1p-4p. This allowed me to drive as much as I want, take breaks whenever, go and charge, and just come back and go straight back on the track.

Weather: Hot and humid. It's been so dang hot lately. It rained in the morning to make it even more humid, too. Started the day off mid 70s and mostly cloudy, quickly rose to the 90s and sun.

Schedule: I needed to be at the track around 9:15 so I got charged up to 91% (what time allowed after my 3.5 hour drive to the charger) then headed to the track (18 miles away). First entered the track right at 10a, did 3 laps, then short break, 4 laps, short break, 6 laps, short break, 5 laps, charge, 5 laps, break, 3 laps, short break, 3 laps, done.

First laps: The first three laps were pretty slow, just to get a feel for the car and heat up the tires a bit. I initially left the tires at the stock 50psi, and chalked a few places on the tires to keep an eye on how much they were rolling over. I knew I would have to let air out as they heated up. First few laps were 2:30 down to 2:17 (my M4 can do about 1:49). After these three, I exited the track to check the tires and remove some air. During this point, the car had the fans on to (I think) cool the battery/motors. Much to my surprise, by the time I was done letting air out of my tires, the fans had already shut off. I assume this means the car thinks the batteries/motors are back to a normal operating temperature.

Next laps: Went back out for four more pretty easy laps (2:25 down to 2:12). Jumped quick off the track just to let more air out and went back on.

First faster laps: Finally pushed the car a bit harder, braked later, harder in the corners and got down to 2:04, only 15 seconds slower than the M4. In addition, the M4 can hit about 133 on the main straight and I hit 129 during these laps before going hard on the brakes. Did a couple more hard laps, then a nice slow cool down lap before exiting the track for a few minutes. The fans again turned off before I went back on the track.

Pushing it: Next laps: 2:03, 2:00.121 (so close!), then a much slower lap as I let a few cars pass, then two more laps between 2:00 and 2:01. The last lap brought me down to 12% battery. I let the car cool a bit, ate a little food, then drove over to EA.

Charging: Left the track at 11%, arrived at 4% to a full EA. Waited several minutes then was able to plug in a 350kW charger at 3%. Charged as expected. Hit 262kW at 5% then quickly dropped because of the very safe(?) Lucid charging curve. I roamed around Walmart while the car charged from 3% to 81% in 39 minutes.

Back to the track!: Two slow laps to warm up the tires, then 3 hard laps, 2 of which were sub 2 minutes, best was 1:59.072. Woo! Took like a 10 minute break before heading back out.

Let's really push: 3 laps, best was 1:58.109. Small break while I decided if I wanted to go charge and come back for several more laps, or just go really hard for 3 more laps and leave. Decided to just do 3 more. 1:57.141 and 1:56.426! During the third lap, I got down to 11% charge and either power was slightly limited or I had a really bad couple of corners, so I laid off near the end of the lap.

Final times: Air best lap: 1:56.426. M4 best lap: 1:49.136, only 7 seconds faster. Which is pretty crazy to think about considering how much better the grip is on the M4.

Stat comparisons: Using the TrackAddict app, the top speed for the M4 best lap is 131 while the top speed for the Air best lap is 128. (I did hit a GPS top speed of 131, but my fastest laps all had top speeds of 128, probably due to braking earlier to hit the apex properly). Additionally, the M4 top lateral Gs is around 1.5 while the Air barely eclipsed 1.0 (1.07 is the highest, with 1.02 on fastest lap). I'm thinking the Air is probably faster from ~0-100ish while the M4 is faster after that, and of course faster in the corners.

Other notes:
  • I tried to keep the tire pressures around 46psi.
  • I kept regenerative braking on high and it's crazy how much that slows the car from 100+ plus on the "easier" laps.
  • I started with stability control on full, switched to partial, and later to off. Didn't seem to make a ton of difference but there were certain points I could feel it. In general, I was "easy" on the throttle to not oversteer too much, though.
  • When I arrived at the track, I removed the aero caps from the wheels. I figured this would help with ventilation and cooling. When I released air from the tires, the air coming from the fronts was very hot. I put the caps back on after I aired the tires back up at the charger right before heading home.
  • Car is super fast and could keep up with basically any car there (on the straights). This includes a couple Caymans and various generations of Corvettes.
  • Car does not seem to limit power based on battery percentage; at least not until "battery low" comes up at 12% or whatever. My fastest time was on a lap that ended with 16%.
  • The only warning light I ever had was low washer fluid. Turns out the sensor is on the right side of the tank so the warning would pop up on hard right turns 😅

Tire wear: I don't have a specific tire tread caliper, but I do have a regular caliper so I measured my tread in three different main grooves on all four tires immediately before my first lap and immediately after my last. On average, I lost ~1/32 from each tire. The track doesn't have a great surface, and is very hard on the left front, so the outside shoulder of that tire is ummm not in the same condition it was. This isn't a great picture but shows the chunks coming off from the shoulder.
20250629_150159.webp


Efficiency: Here's a big one. During the warm up laps, I would get ~0.9 mi/kWh. During the hard laps, that would drop to 0.5 mi/kWh. A/C was off while driving with both front windows down. My lifetime efficiency with 18k miles is ~3.3 so I got about 1/7th of my normal efficiency.
20250629_140726.webp


My M4 gets ~22 mpg in normal mixed driving (~27 on a highway) but only 6-8 mpg during track or autocross events. So it gets 1/3rd to a 1/4th while driving hard while the Air got 1/7th.

From my first lap to my last (including driving to and from the charger at lunch), I used a total of 125 kWh to travel 119.2 miles.

Summary: Fast car that's hampered by lack of traction. Of course, this is not what the car is made to do, and it actually performed better than I expected. I was initially hoping to get around 2:05 - 2:10 based on my M4's times. To only be 7 seconds short is pretty crazy. Just putting on some summer tires would help considerably. Unfortunately, the rims are only 8" so I wouldn't be able to get wider tires with these same rims. That said, I don't know if I actually plan to take this car to the track again, so stickier wider tires would only hurt efficiency.

Wish list (?): It would be great to see tire temps. My M4 shows tire pressure and tire temps which is helpful is cases like this.
Track mode. Some Teslas have a track mode that shows various things like lap times and G-meter and has more detailed settings. Also can record laps using the built in cameras. I think the Taycan has something similar and I'm sure the Ioniq 5 N does as well.
Battery health/temps. Track mode has this but I'm pretty sure some other EVs show info like this as well. (this is the only one I could foresee Lucid ever adding)


I'm sure there's stuff I'm missing so feel free to ask any questions!
 
I'm trying to post a video but getting an error that says "Oops! We ran into some problems."
 
Very nice writeup!
 
Nice post! Having had numerous BMWs, I always wondered how this would compare to an M model. Think of what the results would have been had this been a Touring or Grand Touring model. I think it would have blown doors off the M model even with the other stock characteristics of the Lucid.
 
Nice post! Having had numerous BMWs, I always wondered how this would compare to an M model. Think of what the results would have been had this been a Touring or Grand Touring model. I think it would have blown doors off the M model even with the other stock characteristics of the Lucid.
Exactly. Can't even imagine how fast I'd be able to go with a few hundred more hp. Or how long my braking zones would have to be 🤣
 
Thanks for write up - felt like I was on my regular forum - Rennlist😎. I’ve done track days with my own cars as well as Porsche track days - both in the summer and on the ice track in Quebec- nice to drive a series of brand new 911’s. Considering Lucid Air isn’t a sports car in the true sense - your times were amazing. Again thanks for - really enjoyed the read. PS - I had a 2018 M4 convertible lined up but it was for my wife and didn’t like the Way car shifted - I loved it. Settled on 440i convertible with M package. I didn’t mind as I have a few other manual sports cars to drive. I think my track days are over now, but my Lucid touring looks like it would be a hoot out on track.
 
I was hoping to see your acceleration times. I too have a 2023 Air Pure AWD. I saw the 480 HP figure at Lucid when I picked the car up. I almost never track anything but I do have a Vbox. My 0-60 is 3.1-3.2 sec. The launch control does almost nothing. This time does not change regardless of SOC (at least down to 40%). I have the larger Michelin Pilot Sport EV tires but my car is fully loaded (don't know about you) but that adds very little weight. We are significantly lighter then the Touring and especially the GT. We likely have a slightly more rigid chassis as a result of the hard top and our center of gravity and roll center are lower.
The real disadvantage comes as speed rises over 100mph. My 1/4 mile time varies significantly with, I believe, SOC. I have not evaluated this enough to know. However, traction does not seem to be an issue. My Pure runs 11.4 to 11.8 1/4 miles. Trap speed varies too. It does drift wonderfully. Not speaking of the newer sport, just ability to slide around corners.
Thanks for your review.
 
I was hoping to see your acceleration times. I too have a 2023 Air Pure AWD. I saw the 480 HP figure at Lucid when I picked the car up. I almost never track anything but I do have a Vbox. My 0-60 is 3.1-3.2 sec. The launch control does almost nothing. This time does not change regardless of SOC (at least down to 40%). I have the larger Michelin Pilot Sport EV tires but my car is fully loaded (don't know about you) but that adds very little weight. We are significantly lighter then the Touring and especially the GT. We likely have a slightly more rigid chassis as a result of the hard top and our center of gravity and roll center are lower.
The real disadvantage comes as speed rises over 100mph. My 1/4 mile time varies significantly with, I believe, SOC. I have not evaluated this enough to know. However, traction does not seem to be an issue. My Pure runs 11.4 to 11.8 1/4 miles. Trap speed varies too. It does drift wonderfully. Not speaking of the newer sport, just ability to slide around corners.
Thanks for your review.
Oddly enough I've never actually timed 0-60 and I never did it on the track or at autocross to look back at the video. I did notice lower SOC did not seem to make a difference (so same as your 0-60). I'm not sure the 1/4 mile time would make too much of a difference with SOC, either. I didn't see any difference on the main straight (about 1/3 mile) and would consistently get to around 130mph.
 
Its been a long time since I actually timed my car with the Vbox, so I took it out last night to charge and time. I've not had the opportunity to top mine out yet either. 0-60 3.1 sec at 50% SOC and 90%. I was unable to get a reliable 1/4 time. Slowest was 11.8, consistent with my earlier times. Speed was 115 mph. According to my 1/4 mile calculator and my known weight (4962 empty, it was not last night) the hp should be 600, which gives a 115.7 trap speed ( slightly better then my previous slowest) trap speed. My previous trap speeds varied from 113 to 122 mph. Still no identified reason for the differences if not SOC but I don't know if those differences correlated with SOC. Codys21 experience seems to dispute this finding. Maybe undetected wheel spins? I won't know until I can repeat the 1/4 mile times reliably. Remember, these times are all on the unprepped street. So maybe so. It seems the Pure AWD likely makes a bit more then the 480 hp quoted by Lucid. Marketing? It was only available for a short time so probably not a priority for Lucid.
 
Great writeup and thread. Unofficially, I understand that there are zero hardware differences, and almost certainly zero software (incl. powertrain/hp) differences, between the 2023 Pure AWD and the 2023 Touring.
 
Don't know that is true but; my car was in to have the wiring harness replaced, the techs know I am interested in getting as much power out of this as possible as soon as the warrantee is expired. I am concerned about overheating the wiring. The said all Air models use the same harness. Now if a tuner would just break the computer code.
 
Great writeup and thread. Unofficially, I understand that there are zero hardware differences, and almost certainly zero software (incl. powertrain/hp) differences, between the 2023 Pure AWD and the 2023 Touring.

Some of the early 2023 Pure AWDs actually have the same HP as the 2023 Tourings. It shows up in the VIN codes. My 2023 Pure AWD was built very late in the model year, so my VIN codes indicate the throttled HP.

One bit of good news for me though. Since my 'closeout' 2023 car was being built at the same time that the 2024s were on the line, I got the highest level (.7) V1 CCC module. I guess that explains why my displays are not laggy as some people note.

To balance that benefit, I didn't get the frunk cover that I should have. Interesting how Lucid manages model year transitions.

I wonder if/when the owners of throttled cars will be offered a HP upgrade. Seems like easy money for Lucid.
 
New here so I am forum lurking.

I find it very interesting how people don't think it's a sports sedan when as you just proved, it is super capable with proper tires/pads.

If the Chassis is neutral and lets you enjoy the drive and responds to inputs I feel it is a sports sedan.

For example we have a V60 Polestar Plugin, this has Ohlins and Brembos, but it is a BAD sports car. It understeers the rotors will warp and you cannot turn off traction control and Volvo limited all cars after 2021 to 118 mph. Even though this had 455 hp. This is still the characteristics after I put good tires on it. It's not engineered to handle.

Lucid's seem to be absolutely engineered to handle. Plus the New M5 is MORE weight than Lucid Air.

I hope to be driving one soon still doing paperwork. I am excited to compare it to my M3x I sold.
 
First, this is going to be quite long so feel free to skim or jump to any section you're more interested in.

Second, I've also taken my car to autocross and that post is here.

Based on my research, it looks like only one other person has posted anything about taking an Air to a track, otherwise nobody else has posted anything about taking an Air to autocross or to a race track (other than the Sapphire for like Car and Driver Lightning Lap), so I want to post about my experience.

Intro: I went to I29 Speedway (formerly RPM (Raceway Park of the Midlands) formerly MAM (Mid America Motorplex)) in Pacific Junction, IA. It's 2.23 miles long and a pretty simple, very safe track that I've been to a couple times before in a 2015 BMW M4 convertible, so I knew this would be a decent place to take the Air. It also has a straight almost a half mile long.

As I've been here with my M4 before, I'll do a few comparisons between the two cars. Here's a quick summary of the two cars:
Car2023 Lucid Air Pure AWD2015 BMW M4 Convertible
HP480430
Curb Weight~5,000~4,000
Tire Size245/45R19265/35ZR-19 front, 285/35ZR-19 rear
Tire TypePirelli P Zero AS Plus Elect (500 treadwear)Michelin Pilot Sport 4S (Max Performance Summer) (300 treadwear)
Drive typeAWDRWD

It's easy to see from the chart above the Air: 1) weighs more, 2) has narrower tires, 3) has tires with considerably less grip
In addition, I put brake pads on my M4 that are specifically for track days. I made no modifications at all to the Air.

This track has some specific HPDE (high performance drivers education) events, but those are more structured in "sessions" where each driver has specific times they are allowed on the track, which may look something like this:
View attachment 30234
Sometimes, there are only 2 or 3 groups, but either way, this generally limits a driver to about 20 minutes on the track and 40 minutes off. I knew this style wouldn't work well for having to leave and charge (charger 20 minutes away).

This specific event I ran was a "Super Sunday" which was only for experienced drivers and there were no sessions; the track was hot from 10a-noon and again from 1p-4p. This allowed me to drive as much as I want, take breaks whenever, go and charge, and just come back and go straight back on the track.

Weather: Hot and humid. It's been so dang hot lately. It rained in the morning to make it even more humid, too. Started the day off mid 70s and mostly cloudy, quickly rose to the 90s and sun.

Schedule: I needed to be at the track around 9:15 so I got charged up to 91% (what time allowed after my 3.5 hour drive to the charger) then headed to the track (18 miles away). First entered the track right at 10a, did 3 laps, then short break, 4 laps, short break, 6 laps, short break, 5 laps, charge, 5 laps, break, 3 laps, short break, 3 laps, done.

First laps: The first three laps were pretty slow, just to get a feel for the car and heat up the tires a bit. I initially left the tires at the stock 50psi, and chalked a few places on the tires to keep an eye on how much they were rolling over. I knew I would have to let air out as they heated up. First few laps were 2:30 down to 2:17 (my M4 can do about 1:49). After these three, I exited the track to check the tires and remove some air. During this point, the car had the fans on to (I think) cool the battery/motors. Much to my surprise, by the time I was done letting air out of my tires, the fans had already shut off. I assume this means the car thinks the batteries/motors are back to a normal operating temperature.

Next laps: Went back out for four more pretty easy laps (2:25 down to 2:12). Jumped quick off the track just to let more air out and went back on.

First faster laps: Finally pushed the car a bit harder, braked later, harder in the corners and got down to 2:04, only 15 seconds slower than the M4. In addition, the M4 can hit about 133 on the main straight and I hit 129 during these laps before going hard on the brakes. Did a couple more hard laps, then a nice slow cool down lap before exiting the track for a few minutes. The fans again turned off before I went back on the track.

Pushing it: Next laps: 2:03, 2:00.121 (so close!), then a much slower lap as I let a few cars pass, then two more laps between 2:00 and 2:01. The last lap brought me down to 12% battery. I let the car cool a bit, ate a little food, then drove over to EA.

Charging: Left the track at 11%, arrived at 4% to a full EA. Waited several minutes then was able to plug in a 350kW charger at 3%. Charged as expected. Hit 262kW at 5% then quickly dropped because of the very safe(?) Lucid charging curve. I roamed around Walmart while the car charged from 3% to 81% in 39 minutes.

Back to the track!: Two slow laps to warm up the tires, then 3 hard laps, 2 of which were sub 2 minutes, best was 1:59.072. Woo! Took like a 10 minute break before heading back out.

Let's really push: 3 laps, best was 1:58.109. Small break while I decided if I wanted to go charge and come back for several more laps, or just go really hard for 3 more laps and leave. Decided to just do 3 more. 1:57.141 and 1:56.426! During the third lap, I got down to 11% charge and either power was slightly limited or I had a really bad couple of corners, so I laid off near the end of the lap.

Final times: Air best lap: 1:56.426. M4 best lap: 1:49.136, only 7 seconds faster. Which is pretty crazy to think about considering how much better the grip is on the M4.

Stat comparisons: Using the TrackAddict app, the top speed for the M4 best lap is 131 while the top speed for the Air best lap is 128. (I did hit a GPS top speed of 131, but my fastest laps all had top speeds of 128, probably due to braking earlier to hit the apex properly). Additionally, the M4 top lateral Gs is around 1.5 while the Air barely eclipsed 1.0 (1.07 is the highest, with 1.02 on fastest lap). I'm thinking the Air is probably faster from ~0-100ish while the M4 is faster after that, and of course faster in the corners.

Other notes:
  • I tried to keep the tire pressures around 46psi.
  • I kept regenerative braking on high and it's crazy how much that slows the car from 100+ plus on the "easier" laps.
  • I started with stability control on full, switched to partial, and later to off. Didn't seem to make a ton of difference but there were certain points I could feel it. In general, I was "easy" on the throttle to not oversteer too much, though.
  • When I arrived at the track, I removed the aero caps from the wheels. I figured this would help with ventilation and cooling. When I released air from the tires, the air coming from the fronts was very hot. I put the caps back on after I aired the tires back up at the charger right before heading home.
  • Car is super fast and could keep up with basically any car there (on the straights). This includes a couple Caymans and various generations of Corvettes.
  • Car does not seem to limit power based on battery percentage; at least not until "battery low" comes up at 12% or whatever. My fastest time was on a lap that ended with 16%.
  • The only warning light I ever had was low washer fluid. Turns out the sensor is on the right side of the tank so the warning would pop up on hard right turns 😅

Tire wear: I don't have a specific tire tread caliper, but I do have a regular caliper so I measured my tread in three different main grooves on all four tires immediately before my first lap and immediately after my last. On average, I lost ~1/32 from each tire. The track doesn't have a great surface, and is very hard on the left front, so the outside shoulder of that tire is ummm not in the same condition it was. This isn't a great picture but shows the chunks coming off from the shoulder.
View attachment 30243

Efficiency: Here's a big one. During the warm up laps, I would get ~0.9 mi/kWh. During the hard laps, that would drop to 0.5 mi/kWh. A/C was off while driving with both front windows down. My lifetime efficiency with 18k miles is ~3.3 so I got about 1/7th of my normal efficiency.
View attachment 30244

My M4 gets ~22 mpg in normal mixed driving (~27 on a highway) but only 6-8 mpg during track or autocross events. So it gets 1/3rd to a 1/4th while driving hard while the Air got 1/7th.

From my first lap to my last (including driving to and from the charger at lunch), I used a total of 125 kWh to travel 119.2 miles.

Summary: Fast car that's hampered by lack of traction. Of course, this is not what the car is made to do, and it actually performed better than I expected. I was initially hoping to get around 2:05 - 2:10 based on my M4's times. To only be 7 seconds short is pretty crazy. Just putting on some summer tires would help considerably. Unfortunately, the rims are only 8" so I wouldn't be able to get wider tires with these same rims. That said, I don't know if I actually plan to take this car to the track again, so stickier wider tires would only hurt efficiency.

Wish list (?): It would be great to see tire temps. My M4 shows tire pressure and tire temps which is helpful is cases like this.
Track mode. Some Teslas have a track mode that shows various things like lap times and G-meter and has more detailed settings. Also can record laps using the built in cameras. I think the Taycan has something similar and I'm sure the Ioniq 5 N does as well.
Battery health/temps. Track mode has this but I'm pretty sure some other EVs show info like this as well. (this is the only one I could foresee Lucid ever adding)


I'm sure there's stuff I'm missing so feel free to ask any questions!
Awesome you took it to the track
Pretty solid results
 
Some of the early 2023 Pure AWDs actually have the same HP as the 2023 Tourings. It shows up in the VIN codes. My 2023 Pure AWD was built very late in the model year, so my VIN codes indicate the throttled HP.
Whoa whoa -- where can I look this up? Please share! I ordered my Pure AWD in April 2022, delivered July 2023 so one of the earliest Pure AWD's, have been confounded unable to learn horsepower number......
 
Whoa whoa -- where can I look this up? Please share! I ordered my Pure AWD in April 2022, delivered July 2023 so one of the earliest Pure AWD's, have been confounded unable to learn horsepower number......

Here's my understanding... Look at the seventh character on your VIN. If it's an 'F' (like mine), it's 480 HP. If it's an 'E', it's 620 HP.

Please let me know how it goes...
 
Here's a question that someone might have the answer to. Assume that I have a 480 HP 2023 Air Pure AWD and a 620 HP 2023 Air Touring AWD, noting that the 2023 Pure AWD is simply a software-limited HP version of the 2023 Touring AWD. If I drive both like the sedate old fart that I am, such that I never tap into the extra horsepower, will my miles/kWh be essentially the same?

I get that an ICE car with an extra 140 HP would get lower mileage in that scenario, but I doubt that it would affect an EV if you never tap into it. In fact, I seem to recall one of the Lucid execs saying that when driving conservatively, a more powerful motor might yield an even higher miles/kWh than a less powerful motor would.

It would be an interesting thing to know if Lucid ever does offer software-driven horsepower upgrades...
 
Here's my understanding... Look at the seventh character on your VIN. If it's an 'F' (like mine), it's 480 HP. If it's an 'E', it's 620 HP.

Please let me know how it goes...
Mine is F. My intuition is your info seems right, feels more like ~480hp than >600hp the one time I tried launch mode and held it into the higher speed range.
My buddy nearby has a Touring AWD, maybe we need to do side by side launch mode test.
 
Mine is F. My intuition is your info seems right, feels more like ~480hp than >600hp the one time I tried launch mode and held it into the higher speed range.

Yeah. I doubt that many got out the door with the whole enchilada.

My buddy nearby has a Touring AWD, maybe we need to do side by side launch mode test.

Yikes! Call me an old fuddy-duddy, but a side-by-side launch sounds like a very bad idea!
 
Here's my understanding... Look at the seventh character on your VIN. If it's an 'F' (like mine), it's 480 HP. If it's an 'E', it's 620 HP.

Please let me know how it goes...
This description of the VIN is consistent with my experience. I tested this random VIN decoder that I found on the internet: https://stat.vin/vin-decoding/lucid/air -- and it came back saying that the engine power for a VIN with an "F" in the seventh place was 358 kW (~480 hp). For fun, I replaced the "F" with an "E" -- and it came back saying that the engine power was 462 kW (~620 hp).

That being said, I've had both RWD Pures and AGTs as loaners (haven't yet driven a Touring, funnily enough). To me, the AWD Pure feels closer to the AGT (819 hp) than to the RWD Pure (430 hp) in terms of acceleration, velocity capabilities and overall dynamics. The AWD Pure certainly doesn't have the top end (or the heft) of the AGT, but it feels a *lot* faster than its "only" 50 hp increase over the RWD Pure would suggest.
 
Back
Top