Search results

I think the difference here is that "working" backup camera is actually legally required and written out in FMVSS 111 and it would be a recall(and subject of many recalls by many manufacturers) if it fails to display within 2 seconds of shifting to reverse, however the definition of "working"...

Not displaying rear view image within 2 seconds of putting in reverse is a violation of FMVSS 111 and Lucid has issued a recall for that in the past. https://www.nhtsa.gov/recalls?nhtsaId=23V520000 However, I didn't see any mention of any latency requirements, so I suppose it's legal to just...

interesting..... The actual TCU doesn't seem difficult to remove and replace, so I guess the labor is spent on coding the module? In my scenario, the update started, and performed most of the update sans the updated version in the display setting and broke the DD function, which tried to yank...

We have to be reminded that insurance companies are private, for profit. And hopefully Lucid can find ways to lower the repairing costs else the insurance premiums will keep go up for all owners. Yes "the insurance is paying all of it", sure, but they need to make the money back somehow, and you...

I am unsure if the TCU has failed. I can still see the vehicle in the Lucid app and do all the controls(climate, pre-condition etc), and the car still sees WIFI and shows connectivity bars. Though I do believe Lucid CS mentioned the vehicle shows as "offline" in their system I am sure Lucid...

That applies to every vehicle, and yes components could been perfectly fine but fail shortly after your purchase. But I guess there isn't a way to inspect software related components to know they are "good" or could be bricked in the next OTA. It's possible. From the service record I have...

I skimmed through the post you linked. It seems the Lucid didn't cover that either(and a reminder that vehicle was still IN WARRANTY if I am reading it correctly) I honestly would have been okay if they say the TCU has to be replaced at 1200 something dollars, but at 10K+, I am not sure if its...

So here's what happened on my side 2.4 update came and showed available to update, I pressed update in the phone app - started - then when I got in the car next day a message shows up says update failed. Called CS and was told I need to wait few weeks until I can file a ticket. Then another...

Okay got a reply from lucid finally. They said the access module needs to be replaced for sure and that itself is 10K+ in cost and one week of service time. After that it's possible other modules and cameras may need to be replaced as well and who knows how much those would cost....... Asked...

the car is out of warranty and the vehicle is refusing to update OTA. SC wants the car in and "there is a possibility that components may need to be replaced for the new software. It is a possibility of the modules and cameras will need to be replaced." will schedule the service and see how that...

there is a thread about Lucid seems to have more checks in place before sending the power https://lucidowners.com/threads/j1772-emulation-for-v2l.8908/#post-239689

https://www.tesla.com/en_ca/support/tesla-app/apple-watch

you should be okay with Lectron or A2Z. Don't go with no name brands https://a2zevshop.com/products/j1772-extension-cord-48a-16ft-5m

I'm wondering if it would work for states with ezpass gates that doesn't open until a tag is detected, I'm assuming the sensor will be pointed towards the front of the vehicle and is unlikely to register the transponder pointing back?

so...... what if you use an J1772 to Tesla adapter and then plug that into a teslaTap?;) Vehicle J1772 -> J1772-NACS adapter -> TeslaTap back to J1772 -> J1772 to NEMA 5-15

I would just buy a Tesla Mobile charger since it's cheaper and uses the same NACS connector unless you want high power charging(more than 32A)

142 miles = 228.5 km, so that field is probably in km

Has anyone been asked to bring the car into service to diagnose failed OTA issues and what were the outcomes? The CS has transferred my request to OTA team which then forwarded it to service. Service now wants the car for unknown amount of diagnostics time and maybe magically the computer will...

Initially failed the update from 2.3.10->2.4.0, where the phone app went from 16% complete to as if update hasn't happened, and showed 2.3.10 as up to date got pushed with 2.4.4 few hours ago and initiated the update from the phone. Checked back 20 mins later and saw that there is no progress...

If the 80A version overheats and the 60A doesn't, I'm pretty sure that's more of a product defect