Search results

Got 2.6.16 installed yesterday. Luckily no disasters thus far. Don't see much difference in the car's behavior in general. However there is a new (and quite amusing) warning in the Dream Drive saying something like "your face cannot be recognized and therefore stop and go function is...

I would predict that it will come when they will start putting Gravity screens in the newly produced Airs (MY 2027?). I don't think UX3 will come to current Airs, but instead they will see something like 2.9... I hope I am wrong.

For sure no need to worry about OTA diarrhea😉

I don't think we should expect any Air OTAs any time soon. Doesn't look like it's a priority for Lucid as it is focused on rolling the Gravity out. *And a few disclaimers for the regular fan base: 1. Lucid is a greatest car/technology company. 2. Nobody ever promised that any updates will come...

Looks like they redesigned the available cars webpage. But all of the AGTs and ATs had DD premium, none with DD pro...

After the 2.6.11 update it also stops working abruptly without a warning, can happen several times during the ride...

For those who can write it off as a business expense, lease makes a lot of sense. That made last end of year lease incentives for Air even more attractive. Still, the Gravity lease numbers are definitely on the higher side...

Sorry, this is not a direct reply to your message. But I found this reference on the FB Lucid owner group. Looks like this picture was seen on one of the threads😉

In my line of business, we try not to use absolute terms (like 100% or 0 percent, never or always, nothing or only). Technology is everywhere. And yes, the "tech company" term has been traditionally applied to companies involved in communication technology, data, robots, software and hardware...

Well, certainly I won't get down to calling names or invoking absurdity. But you probably don't follow sportswear industry too closely. Here are some links to new technologies proudly developed by Nike: https://www.nike.com/a/air-max-dn-release-info...

Who knows what's errogant and insulting?.. Some people would say that calling opinions different than yours "errogant and insulting" is errogant and insulting. Or assuming a person's type without knowing them 🤷‍♂️. And actually it was not a reviewer but a Lucid exec himself who called it a tech...

I agree with you. I think Tesla made the car around software, making it a kind of appliance or a "fast iPad" if you will. Lucid is making it's cars for driving and they are pretty good about it. I hope their software part will catch up soon...

100%. Then every company "that evolves or 'makes' things work" is a technology company.

An excellent and a very informative diagram. I would argue that the hidden part of the iceberg is present in any modern car (except for battery management/charging on ICE cars ofc). And the above water part of the iceberg is behind in Lucid. That's exactly what I meant.

Intel is heavily into cloud services, not only hardware. AMD makes hardware for software, so yes it is tech. Lucid makes cars. Is Toyota a tech company? There is a lot of tech in their cars as well 🤷‍♂️. Tesla is probably a tech company, since their cars are very software-centered (and...

Agreed. But that all comes under "automotive" or "EV-making" umbrellas. Making airplanes involves a lot of technology as well, but nobody calls Boeing a tech company... When talking about technology people mostly mean communications, IT etc, where Lucid is lagging behind (hope not for long).

The funniest statement in this clip is towards the end, when one of the execs says: "We are a technology company". I think for now they better stick to "automotive" or "EV making" line. They definitely make great EV's and cars in general, but technology is their weakest part IMHO.

Can you please share your grandpa's longevity secrets (assuming it's you on the profile picture)? ;)

I think it goes both ways. The cameras should not be laggy and if they are, Lucid should fix them. But Lucid (or any other car company) would not and should not pay for the damage which is caused because of that, as the primary responsibility for safety is still on the driver and not on the...

My 2025 AT averaged 3.3-3.4 m/kwh over first 3k miles (since December 2024) in SF Bay Area. My daily drive is a mix of hills, freeway and city driving. So I guess that's why efficiency in on the lower side. Recently I drove ~ 100 mi on a freeway with 3 other adults in the car, and it did 3.9 m/kwh.