- Joined
- Jun 25, 2025
- Messages
- 35
- Reaction score
- 44
- Cars
- Explorer, Spark EV
All the 800+ HP ICE vehicles I know of are notoriously unreliable.
All the 800+ HP ICE vehicles I know of are notoriously unreliable.
I have mine for four weeks and is now on a second round of service issues, first a rear seat issue and now a rear drive unit. Not feeling confident about being an early adopter on this one.
That, is an absolutely OUTSTANDING point. We are putting a lot of stress on these systems. ICE or EV, you are bound to have certain failures be more prolific just due to this.All the 800+ HP ICE vehicles I know of are notoriously unreliable.
We had the rear (only) drive unit replaced in our 2014 85 MS and the front half shafts replaced in our 2018 100D MS.Half shafts were an issue in early R1Ss. Mine included.
As I’ve mentioned elsewhere, my rear drive unit in a very early Tesla X P90D failed after a week.
I agree, we hear about them more with EVs because there are fewer EVs and they’re scrutinized more.
There are all sorts of failures and issues with ICE cars, but folks have just gotten used to them.
If you have some form of hardware failure then yes, that’s going to be annoying that far from a Service Center. It does seem “most” of the issues are software related with some minor QC on the vehicle itself. I’ve got some things that need to be addressed on the car but am just waiting another month or so to see if anything else pops up before booking it in and giving the list. If you take that approach and keep a list of any minor / little things then send it to the Service Center once to get fixed will be much less problematic than getting Lucid to fix one issue at a time.Getting my Gravity this month and no service center within 5 hours of my home. I shouldn't be this nervous... lol.
Yeah this one is particularly outside the norm with @Ron_Burgundy window motor failure as that’s such a random thing to happen, like I’ve never heard of that happening on a new car, just random bad luck with a defective part. I don’t even think Lucid could be faulted for that one, but then it comes down to how it is being serviced because yeah, very much not ideal when the door is disabled for weeks.If you have some form of hardware failure then yes, that’s going to be annoying that far from a Service Center. It does seem “most” of the issues are software related with some minor QC on the vehicle itself. I’ve got some things that need to be addressed on the car but am just waiting another month or so to see if anything else pops up before booking it in and giving the list. If you take that approach and keep a list of any minor / little things then send it to the Service Center once to get fixed will be much less problematic than getting Lucid to fix one issue at a time.
Have to give credit when it’s due. Got call from Lucid Service this afternoon to fit me in this Monday - before next road trip and well before original 9/18 date.
They’re clearly trying hard and I appreciate that.
I think this reflects the differing development processes for hardware vs software. The serial production time on a mechanical component is long (months), and the production and assembly sets the whole timeline. No motors, no vehicle -- no seats, no vehicle -- no brakes, no vehicle -- but also you can potentially swap out one supplier part for another and reset your timeline.I know there has been a trend in software of releasing at the almost finished/90% done stage and finish after release.